A Redirect in the Conflicts of Climate Change
Is global warming happening? Yes, but it is not catastrophic or a crisis, and most certainly, as it has been for thousands of years, naturally cyclical. The Earth has been considerably warmer and the carbon dioxide levels much, much higher during past epochs. As many physicists and scientists have verified and illustrated, the levels of carbon dioxide increase as temperatures rise.
Conversely, the activist climate advocacy alleges that warming follows an increase in carbon dioxide. However, these climate campaigners are compelled to assert and promote this position so they can blame it on humans and a multitude of human activities. Nature cannot be tamed, but humans can be regimented in a manner that suits the environmental evangelist. When the climate preacher stands at the pulpit and says, “I can save you from yourselves”, many disciples will follow.
The proselytizer gains power and wealth, as the populace awaits the solution. The concept of "create the problem, sell the solution" is a strategy where a problem is intentionally created or exacerbated. Then a solution is offered, often for power, profit, and notoriety. Through promotion, the greater the perception of the problem and the longer it is extended, the greater the authority and influence become.
The largest gathering of climate peddlers is the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The first COP conference, heralded as COP1, took place in Berlin, Germany in 1995.
COP28 in Dubai had almost 86,000 participants, while COP28 in Baku, Azerbaijan had a little fewer than 71,000 in attendance. In November of this year, COP30 will be held in the rainforest city of Belém, Brazil – Belém is Portuguese for Bethlehem – I am not sure of the significance there as it relates to climate communion or required time spent in the climate confessional.
While these conferences discuss food sustainability, one can be assured that crickets and slugs are not on the main course.
Brazil has appointed André Corrêa do Lago as the Cop30 president. Despite being an economist, the pro-climate change British newspaper, The Guardian, has anointed Corrêa do Lago, as a top “climate negotiator”.
The quintessential reason for the coronation of Corrêa do Lago, as exhibited in The Guardian article, “World faces new danger of ‘economic denial’ in climate fight, Cop30 head says“, where he states, “It’s not a scientific denial, it’s an economic denial.” The article goes on to state, “So the argument has shifted, Corrêa do Lago believes, from undermining or misrepresenting the science to attempts to counter climate policy.” Of course, Corrêa do Lago is incorrect on both counts, namely, scientific denial and economic denial.
The proponent and manipulated science of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) has been disproven and rebuked each time a new research paper arrives. The counter, then, is as always, the mathematically flawed “consensus”. The issue of advocating for climate policy which will then collapse the economy is undeniable. As I have long covered, there is no manner or quantity of renewable or alternative fuels that can replace traditional fuels. Further, the costs of sufficient storage batteries is so prohibitive, there is not a nation on earth that can flip that bill.
A significant motivation for changing the next COP conference to the theme of economics is because American President Donald Trump’s directives are to return to more conventional, long-established fuels and cut the vast quantity of spending on renewable energies. Trump’s moves have given impetus to other nations to follow suit.
Trump’s elimination of the previous administration’s Clean Power Plan 2.0 in the Real Clear Energy article, “Making the Power Grid Great Again” describes many of the future plans administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Administrator Lee Zeldin.
