The socialist left to the moderate left constantly promotes censorship of speech, debate, or journalism that conflicts or is dissimilar from their ideological concepts or precepts. They have a significant struggle with the first amendment to the Constitution and especially the item I bold, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Canada’s citizens have the same right inscribed into Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In an endeavor to obstruct constitutionality, politicians in both countries say they are fluid documents, open to challenge and reinterpretation.
As I wrote in “Disinformation Initiatives”, the Biden administration,”. . . made efforts to create a ‘Disinformation Governance Board” which was to be led by Nina Jankowicz, until someone discovered a video of her singing the disinformation song to the melody of Mary Poppin’s “Supercalifragilistic. That performance immediately divulged her leftist politics and unambiguous inability to pursue fairness and political equality.” The radical idea of the Disinformation Governance Board was immediately scrapped.
In an article in “The Observer”, a United Kingdom newspaper, published on Sundays, they spent a significant amount of time and money to determine which news outlets were their foremost adversarial publications opposing the newspaper’s belief in the theory of climate change. The article is entitled, Hot Air: methodology.
They offer absolutely no evidence of CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming) rather, they expend a convoluted amount of time on Artificial Intelligence (AI) servers and search engines analyzing several opposing terms in opposition to their climate change assumptions. After their investigation, they arrived at the primary enemies’ list. Not unexpectedly, I didn’t make the cut.
It is quite revealing that when one side wants to silence the other, that the former is perpetually running very scared. It seems always to be the case.
My apologies - I forgot the "bolding" in the first paragraph - "abridging the freedom of speech should have been bolded.