Climate Change - The Unprovable
The one major, colossal hurdle facing anthropogenic climate change is it just cannot be empirically proven. Despite everything you may have ever heard, all of the supposed testimony, all of the papers, studies, and reports, human-induced climate change, known by its formal, official name, Anthropogenic Catastrophic Global Warming (ACGW) has not been proven, and likely will never be a verifiable science or reality.
It is a theory first presented on June 23, 1988, by James Hansen, Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in congressional testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Hansen’s testimony was thoroughly speculative and his opening statement centered on warming in the USA up to June of 1988. Summer warming, he said up to that point could be perceptible to the typical human or as he said, “I believe that this change in the frequency of hot summers is large enough to be noticeable to the average person”.
Of course, sitting in that very committee chamber was then-Senator Al Gore, hand cupped to his ear, seeing opportunity and budding potential in each word and every inference.
During his evidentiary statements, Hansen made several predictions predicated on specific weather assumptions. Hansen’s cohort Al Gore has made many predictions as have many proponent scientists, politicians, and environmental bureaucrats. Thirty-four years later, all predictions, prophecies, and forecasts related to human-induced climate change have failed. In many cases, the prophets simply move the goal posts – never making excuses, just editing events and timelines in their ever-changing calendars.
The advocate supporters of climate change have seized onto one claim, longer than any other – it is the declaration of consensus – built up as high as 97%. Even though ‘consensus’ is not a science and the 97% has been invalidated and quashed several times, it is their celebrated, unconditional weapon of choice.
Climate change is not a test tube science; or has it a dialectic method or path; it cannot be validated by any type or method of applied mathematics or any unit of specific empirical measure. It is beyond any traditional science to prove. The collection of history, anthropology, and archeology have a better probability of proof, but it too, with its wide variances of natural variability, is in the corner of the climate change refuter.
Shouted from and through the rooftops is the increasing amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere which totals .04% of its entirety - a trace element in the atmosphere. Humans contribute only a very small fraction of that .04% - most CO2 is emitted by nature, but you'll never hear that from the alarmists.
Climate change is essentially a religion in that it is strictly a matter of belief or faith. Scripturally, Gore 3:16 says it’s happening, but one must have a devotion and piety towards that scripture because empirical science is not in the same corner. Elizabeth Warren steadfastly claims of climate change, “I believe in science”. Science is not something to believe in. No, she believes in the religion of climate change as a conduit for ulterior motives because science is not a tool of faith but a works towards a certainty – a science, any science, is never totally provable but can at least remain in the realm of possibility – in that climate change falls, fails and falters.
If people are trying to make others accept as true that a truly overwhelmingly destructive and devastating occurrence is going to happen, yet have no actual or verifiable evidence or corroboration of that accusation, what does it really mean? When people are so obsessed with the appeal to fear, that without clear substantiation, they are willing to annihilate the mental health of children by indoctrinating them with anxiety and trepidation, what truly in the hell is that?
So what is it with climate change? Why has an unproven theory with no physical dimension become so influential? The proponents said the storm numbers of every type will increase, all storms will assuredly intensify, the shorelines will flood with the unprecedented rise of oceans, floods will drown much of the earth, droughts will devastate crops, wildfires will be endless and both humans and animals will undergo unimaginable suffering and loss of life. Yet, none of that has happened, but the marketing of its horror continues – the longer nothing happens, the stronger and stricter the marketing becomes. It seems like it is being driven into perpetuity.
They say the change of climate and its devastation is greater on the disadvantaged – the minorities and every person heralded as a victim of some sort and this has been done by specific people, those they hate, and it was been ostensibly done. The target of climate change rules and reigns over anyone under the umbrella requiring social justice provided they fit the unyielding criteria characterized by the liberal ruling elites.
So what really is climate change since it’s so obviously false? It has many ulterior motives and scared people that seem to be easily controlled The United Nations and the Davos crowd craves one-world order; while the left pines for socialism and domination beyond. The Chinese would love the elimination of fossil fuels, because they would not participate and thus gain the strongest economy and military in the world. This would seem to take care of all these desires – and the ruthless ogres would be in charge.