Several years ago, I recall watching television news opinion host Bill O’Reilly interview Al Gore during a bitterly cold period in the northeastern United Sates. This was well before the universal use of “Zoom”, so the interview was conducted over the telephone. O’Reilly first commented about the enormous quantity of snow and a lingering, massive cold front that remained for a number of weeks prior to finally relinquishing its chilling grip.
O’Reilly asked Gore, if global warming was genuine, why were these wintry conditions so prevalent and so robust? Gore replied that this was exactly what we could expect and that the climate models predicted this type of weather even as the earth warmed globally.
However, as all predictions of doom fall by the wayside, as the prophecies of natural disasters wane, and as all of the forecasted threats come to naught, more and more activist scientists turn to climate models as the optimum assurance of the pending human demise.
Yet, Nature, that magazine of extreme climate change devotion, admits the failure of climate models and that even the “most up-to-date models are entirely incompatible with observational records.” And furthermore, it is these models that are relied on entirely for developing environmental public policy.
Dr. John Christy, climate scientist and director of the Earth Systems and Science Center at the University of Alabama, Huntsville initiated satellite remote sensing of global climate and speaks frequently on the distortion and corruption of climate models. I link a YouTube video of Christy talking about climate models here.
Since progressive politics cites anthropogenic climate change as a social quandary as well as a physical phenomenon, the counterfeit condition provides them with the excuse for over-reaching governance, creation of greater restrictive regulation and control of every part of society.
Andrew Montford of the Global Warming Policy Foundation writes a detailed essay on the “Ten Things Everyone Should Know about Climate Models.” I link his paper below. Once read, I am confident you’ll remove any trust you may have had in climate models as a predictor of absolutely anything, and most especially, our planet’s future.
As the author explains in a preface to his paper, “Claims of a climate crisis rely almost entirely on climate model outputs. But once you know what climate models get wrong, it’s hard to take them seriously as any sort of guide to the future, never mind government policy.”
You can read the paper here.