The Fickle Pickle
Eco-politicians and activist scientists assert that human-generated climate change is the evilest, existential threat to the earth’s very existence. It is what is going to slaughter all of us at some point or another. It will terminate life on earth; it will anger Mother Nature to such a level of rage and infuriation that she will smite us all down like an endless line of hot, smoking Gatlin guns.
There is nothing human ingenuity or innovation can do about it. There is no wall that can stop the onslaught of the natural terror that will reign down as we continue along the path of what - I ask, what? Since the vast majority of people that believe in climate change, believe it upon the alarming words and deceptive testimony of others, who really knows ‘what’ is?
The legacy media outlets are saying climate change is real. This could not be because 70% of journalists admit to liberalism and support the party that advocates for climate change as a verity. That of course is among those admitting to any bias while many of the worst cases continue to say they report right down the middle. They provide a lot of frightening stories, but as most people identify only with a persuasion of pessimism and darkness – optimism and light do not sell the news quite as well. Why, if their material and assertions are so authentic and true, do they want to censor and suppress opposing views? That, as Vlasic might say, is quite a pickle.
So here is what these people are essentially responding with when you first speak truths of and about climate:
Storm numbers have not increased – so what, they will. Storm intensities or storm force have not increased; so what, they will. Neither droughts nor floods have increased; so what they will. Wildfires have not increased; so what they will. The ocean levels have not risen at an unusual rate; so what they will do? The temperatures have not increased at an unusual rate or as predicted; so what they will. All the prophecies and predictions of gloom and doom have not come true; so what they eventually will. The earth has been through these same cycles previously; so this is different.
All of the “so whats” and a few others are what constitute the bona fide compilation of the propagandized consensus. What is really going to fix the “currently invisible, but certain to be our existential threat” one that is destined to be the conclusive ruination of all civilization?
Will it be a termination in the production and distribution of oil and gas? This substance that lends itself to thousands of other products, while providing people with the freedoms and liberties to go where they want, when they want and without draining bank accounts – this substance that employs millions and does in no manner, at the current time, have any replacement materials or mechanisms – not even close.
Will it be the Paris Climate Accord? A non-treaty or document of guesses on how much each nation purports to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by a specified date, but rather more so the continuous transfer of billions of dollars from wealthier nations to nations declaring a need for climate change reparations, many with nefarious, corrupt leaders and tyrants – refer back to the entire fourth paragraph to see what type of climate change reparations have been needed, but constantly applied for.
Will it be the Green New Deal or some other elaborate government scheme? A document that provides climate change relief based totally on identity politics and was never intended as a climate change document, but transformed into one to give it purpose outside of its intent and a scheme that seems so much more palatable.
Will it be “Cap and Trade” or “Carbon Taxes”? These add-ons to an already heavily taxed world that to date have shown no signs of slowing the increasing levels of carbon dioxide.
Will it be your personal carbon footprint that makes the real difference? Is it your renouncement of beef or your car forever remaining in the garage and the bicycle coming out? It seems to be the case certainly in comparison to the largest emitter in the world. Communist China can vomit emissions and other pollutants at gargantuan rates and have the dirtiest waters, lands, and seas in the world, but there is never any disdain or contempt from the climate mongers. One has to wonder why except there are the forgiving presses, the suppression of bad news, the NBA, Hollywood, and conveniently bought politicians.
Will it be the isolations and lockdowns like that that we experience with the coronavirus? As with the taxes in the paragraph above, after a year of experiencing these demands, carbon dioxide continues to climb. Will people even continue to abide by these detrimental demands that have so wreaked havoc on societal norms and people’s economic and emotional needs?
Will it be the progressive governments that insist on curtailing the use of fossil fuels in every insistence, replacing them with renewable energies that create blackouts, brownouts, and total-outs? These progressive governments resist the use of safe, reliable, abundant, and CO2-free nuclear energy, especially reactors fed with the vast abundance of thorium. A solution negates control and cancels out climate change as a false but acceptable conduit for economic and political transformation.
Why do people want to believe the frightening alarm of climate change as if it was a horror movie? Do they simply believe the good guys in white hardhats will ride to victory at the end and then society can traverse normally into a non-warming, setting sun? Why do people want to bring forth scary scenarios and terrible doom and gloom that injuriously damage people’s mental health – especially the youth and the very young?
Why would anyone want to persuade our teachers to teach the fabricated horrors of climate change in our early education systems, or preach these same horrible scenarios from the church pulpits that were never intended for such a purpose?
Why do we spend trillions upon trillions of dollars on this invisible, unproven theory and let people, especially those neglected souls in third-world countries, languish, suffer and die? Yet, those in the elitist class as well as those in high-power leadership assume themselves guiltless of climate change crime, determined to make you believe they are your saviors and not impostors using climate change as a tool for authoritarian command and control.
Everyone has the right to think as they wish and then to contemplate and arrive at the answers they deem most appropriate; however, I encourage that thinking not to be mere acceptance of the media talking heads and politicians.